Martin, did you see Etzel Cardena’s summary in the 2018 APA journal regarding successful psi research?

It meets all your criteria. The proof that it was valid is the fact that the person hired to rebut it admitted not even examining the research.

He simply stated his belief (which he shared with me over 20 years ago) that there’s no need to look at psi data because it violates the laws of nature. He even, as he boasted, found 2 physicists who agreed with him.

Nobel prize winning physicist, Brian Josephson, has estimated, based on various surveys, that over 60% of physicists in the US do NOT think psi violates the laws of nature, but rather, represents a special case.