I don’t recall you specifying any. As I said, after I discovered, both in our email conversations and on Medium, that you would regularly say either (a) I misrepresented you (without specifying how, simply refusing to continue) or (b) you’d simply, categorically deny something you clearly said, I started keeping a record of what you wrote.

As far as i recall, what I wrote was what you told me.

If you want to approach this honestly, rather than doing what you’ve just done — first, accuse me of misrepresenting you, without providing any evidence of doing so; and second, once again, criticize me (without providing any evidence for it) and suggest there’s more WITHOUT SAYING ANYTHING ABOUT IT:

you could have just added, “I also don’t accept their results because….”

I have been careful in ALL of my responses to quote you accurately. You have not yet made even a pretense of offering an explanation. Readers will then assume that you don’t do this because you can’t.

All you had to do was answer. I’ve quoted you honestly, and to the best of my recollection, included your full response. Rather than avoiding an intelligent dialog this time, you could simply, for the first time, respond to the actual content.